Adverbs¶
What Is (and Is Not) an Adverb in CGEL¶
CGEL treats adverb as a lexical category, not a semantic role or a syntactic function.
Basic adverbs (see list)
The rest, a majority of adverbs are formed by adding -ly to the plain form of an adjective, with a predictable meaning that generally relates to the manner
Small number of adverbs are based on nouns: bodily, chiefly, partly, purposly
Some adjectives can’t accept ly (see list). Manner is not “natural” to them.
Function¶
Modifiers for:
Verbs
Adjectives
Prepositions
Determinatives
Other adverbs
Occasionally even nouns
The remaining forces resisted strongly (verb) Their house was extremely small (adjective) This piano is completely out of tune (preposition) There were hardly any nuts left (determinative) The water was quite unnecessarily hot (adverb) The news recently that he had died shocked us (noun)
Flat Adverbs¶
Some adverbs are identical to their adjective form (see list)
Hit the nail hard You have to dig deep
In modern and informal English, normal adverbs are used as flat verbs:
Love me tender Hold me tight Drink it slow, you hear
If only applies to adverbs following the verb in a VP
~~Quite frank I don’t care~~
Categoty¶
Category vs Function (Foundational Distinction)
CGEL strictly separates:
Category: what kind of word something is
(noun, verb, adjective, adverb, preposition, determiner)Function: what role it plays in a structure
(subject, complement, adjunct, modifier, predicative complement, etc.)
A word can be an adverb by category without functioning as an adverbial.
This distinction underlies everything that follows.
Why category is important at all?¶
Adverbs are heterogeneous morphologically, but the category exists because:
*. It predicts syntactic patterns (position, mobility, combination).
It predicts semantic roles (time, manner, degree, comment, etc.).
Lexical category constrains which words can be used in which functions.
Function alone is not sufficient to describe English adverb behavior.
In other words, CGEL treats “adverb” as a lexical class with characteristic behaviors, even if those behaviors overlap with other categories.
What an Adverb Is (CGEL Perspective)¶
An adverb is identified by a cluster of morphosyntactic properties.
There is no single defining test.
Core diagnostics (converging evidence)¶
A word counts as an adverb if it satisfies enough of the following:
Inflectionless form¶
Adverbs do not inflect for:
number
tense
agreement
case
Examples:
very, often, virtually, almost
(This property is necessary but not sufficient.)
Distribution distinct from adjectives¶
Adverbs:
cannot normally function as predicative complements
cannot directly modify nouns
Contrast:
The task is impossible (adjective ✔︎)
✘ The task is virtually (adverb ✘)
Characteristic modification targets¶
Adverbs typically modify:
verbs (run quickly)
adjectives (virtually impossible)
other adverbs (very slowly)
clauses (frankly, I disagree)
This is a distributional tendency, not a rule.
Morphology (supporting evidence only)¶
Many adverbs are formed with -ly:
virtually, simply, frankly
But:
not all adverbs are -ly (very, quite, almost)
not all -ly forms are adverbs (friendly = adjective)
So morphology supports classification but never determines it.
Interim conclusion¶
In CGEL, adverb is a lexical category identified by formal behavior, not by meaning.
What an Adverb Is Not¶
An adverb is not defined as “a word that modifies a verb”¶
This traditional definition fails immediately:
very cannot modify verbs
✘ very runalmost rarely modifies verbs directly
not does not “modify” in any ordinary semantic sense
Yet all are adverbs.
CGEL therefore rejects semantic definitions of adverbs.
An adverb is not the same as an adverbial¶
Adverbial is a function, not a category.
Examples:
She left yesterday → adverbial ✔︎
She spoke quietly → adverbial ✔︎
But in:
The task was virtually impossible
virtually is:
an adverb (category)
a degree modifier (function)
not an adverbial
Because it modifies an adjective inside an AdjP, not the clause.
She left hastily (adverb) She left in haste (non CGEL “adverbial”, in CGEL it’s a PP that it’s function is modifying a verb)
“Focus adverb” is not a CGEL term¶
CGEL does not use:
focus adverb
focusing adverb
Instead it distinguishes:
focus adjuncts (function)
degree modifiers
other modifier types
Thus:
only, even, also → adverbs functioning as focus adjuncts
virtually, almost, mainly → adverbs functioning as degree modifiers
Example: virtually¶
The task was virtually impossible.
Analysis:
virtually → adverb (category)
modifies impossible (adjective)
function = degree modifier
expresses approximation (“in effect, but not literally”)
It is:
✔︎ an adverb
✔︎ a modifier
✘ not an adverbial
✘ not a focus adjunct
Why CGEL Treats “Adverb” as a Residual Category¶
CGEL openly acknowledges that adverbs are the least homogeneous major category.
They are partly defined by:
what they are not
not nouns
not verbs
not adjectives
not prepositions
This is why CGEL relies on converging diagnostics rather than definitions.
6. Summary (CGEL-Aligned)¶
Adverb = lexical category
Identified by formal distribution, not meaning
Adverbial = clause-level function (not synonymous)
Many adverbs are modifiers inside phrases, not adverbials
Labels like focus adverb are pedagogical, not CGEL
A word is an adverb because of how it behaves syntactically —
not because of what it “modifies” or what it “means”.
7. Common Pitfall (One-Line Warning)¶
If a definition of adverb mentions “modifying verbs”, it is not CGEL-compatible.