Clause: licensing cheatsheet¶
In CGEL, lexical licensing is pervasive rather than exceptional. There is no small closed list of “special cases”. A large part of syntax consists of determining which complements a head licenses.
The deeper CGEL generalization is that subcategorization (sometimes called complement licensing or valency) is one of the central organizing principles of English syntax. Virtually every major lexical category—verbs, adjectives, nouns, and prepositions—can impose restrictions on the complements it licenses.
With clauses, the question is:
Many subordinate clause constructions in English are not freely available, but instead require lexical licensing by the matrix head?
Tip
For finite subordinate clauses, CGEL has only a small number of clause categories whose occurrence is determined by the governing predicate. The principal ones are interrogative, exclamative, and subjunctive clauses. Declarative-indicative clauses are largely the default.
A large fraction of English clause taxonomy exists precisely because different heads license different subordinate-clause constructions.
For example, the distinction between:
declarative content clause
interrogative content clause
subjunctive content clause
infinitival clause
gerund-participial clause
bare infinitival clause
** These categories matter because predicates differ in whether they license them.**
Core principle¶
When a sentence feels grammatical but sounds suspicious, ask:
”Does the governing word license this subordinate-clause construction?"
The clause itself may be perfectly well-formed, yet ungrammatical in that environment.
Declarative content clause (default)¶
Construction:
that + finite indicative clause
that she left
that they are ready
that he will come
Common licensors:
know
think
believe
say
claim
realize
I know that she left.
I believe that she left.
They claim that she left.
Tip
This is the default complement clause of English. Assume it is available unless you know otherwise.
Interrogative Content Clause¶
Construction:
whether-clause or interrogative clause
whether she left
where she lives
who came
why he resigned
Common licensors:
Questions:
ask
wonder
inquire
Knowledge / Discovery:
know
remember
discover
determine
find out
I wonder whether she left.
I know where she lives.
We discovered who did it.
I believe whether she left.
I think where she lives.
Tip
Not every verb that licenses a declarative clause licenses an interrogative clause.
Mandative Subjunctive Content Clause¶
Construction:
that + subject + plain-form verb
that she leave
that he be present
that they have enough time
Common licensors:
Directives:
insist
demand
order
command
Recommendations:
suggest
recommend
propose
Requirements:
require
stipulate
Mandative adjectives:
essential
necessary
important
vital
I insist that she leave.
They recommended that he be appointed.
It is essential that she be informed.
I know that she leave.
I think that she leave.
Tip
Use the subjunctive mainly with recommendations, requirements, and directives.
Gerund-participial clause¶
Construction:
V-ing clause
leaving early
swimming
answering questions
Common licensors:
enjoy avoid keep finish postpone consider
I enjoy swimming.
She avoided answering.
They postponed leaving.
I enjoy to swim.
She avoided to answer.
Tip
Many activity-oriented verbs prefer an -ing clause.
To-infinitival clause¶
Construction:
to + plain form
to leave
to study
to be
Common licensors:
want
hope
decide
plan
intend
attempt
I want to leave.
She decided to stay.
They hope to win.
I want leaving.
They decided staying.
Tip
Verbs expressing intention, desire, plans, or goals often prefer a to-infinitive.
NP + to-infinitival clause¶
Construction:
NP + to-infinitive
her to leave him to stay them to help
Common licensors:
want
expect
persuade
encourage
tell
advise
I wanted her to leave.
We persuaded him to stay.
They encouraged her to apply.
I wanted her leave.
We persuaded him stay.
Tip
Most verbs that take an object plus an infinitival clause require to.
Bare Infinitival Clause
Construction:
NP + plain-form verb
her leave him go them arrive
Common licensors:
Perception verbs:
see
hear
watch
feel
Causatives:
make
let
I saw her leave.
We heard him sing.
They made him leave.
She let him go.
I wanted her leave.
We persuaded him stay.
Tip
Bare infinitives are highly restricted. If you’re unsure, assume English wants to.
Small Clause¶
Construction:
NP + predicative
him intelligent her a genius the room empty
Common licensors:
consider
find
make
keep
I consider him intelligent.
We found the room empty.
They kept the door open.
I know him intelligent.
She believes him honest.
Tip
Small clauses are a specialized construction licensed by a limited set of predicates.
Clause licensing by verbs 80/20¶
This is leaky generalization: The ultimate licensing is lexical, specific to each word.
Semantic family |
Typical construction |
|---|---|
Knowledge, belief |
Declarative content clause |
Questions, inquiry |
Interrogative content clause |
Desire, intention |
To-infinitival clause |
Enjoyment, avoidance, completion |
Gerund-participial clause |
Recommendation, requirement |
Subjunctive content clause |
Perception, causation |
Bare infinitival clause |
See also
Grammar lists, verbs clause licensing cheatsheet
Danger zones (highest ESL risk)¶
Construction |
Typical Error |
|---|---|
Interrogative content clause |
I think where she lives |
Mandative subjunctive |
I know that she leave |
Gerund vs infinitive |
I enjoy to swim |
Bare infinitive |
I wanted her leave |
NP + infinitive |
I persuaded him stay |
Most advanced ESL mistakes are not failures of clause formation.
They are failures of clause licensing:
The subordinate clause is grammatical in itself, but the governing word does not license it.
That’s exactly what happens in:
I know that she leave.I insist that she leave.
The difference lies not in the clause, but in the licenser.