Clause: Content¶
Definition of the content clause¶
A clause that functions as a single argument or complement, expressing a proposition, idea, or statement.
Often introduced by that / if / whether / wh-words
Can act as subject, object, or complement
That she won surprised everyone. (subject)
I know that she won (object)
The question is whether she will come. (Complement)
Function: conveys “what is said, thought, believed, or asked”.
A content clause is not a relative clause. If often functions as a complement, embedded as subordinate subparts.
Possible CGEL form type:¶
Under CGEL they are distinct clause types with different functions, heads, and syntactic behavior.
Declarative content clause → typical:
I know that she left
Interrogative content clause → reports questions:
I wonder who left
Exclamative content clause → reports exclamations:
I can’t believe how fast she ran!
Imperatives are inherently main clauses, they cannot be embedded as a complement
Complete thought¶
It is complete, and express full sentence-like content (unlike a relative clause, that has a gap which corresponds to to its antecedent).
The content clause is a subordinate in the sentence, but it’s a complete thought or idea. It may not stand as a main sentence, but the thought/idea is complete.
I believed [that she has views like ours] until that speech yesterday
The fact [that vaccines work] was treated as unproven propaganda
That thing can broken before [I ever saw it], you know
Properties¶
A subordinate clause functioning as a complement, licensed by the head word (or sometimes subject).
Head can take a clause as a complement, and impose requirements what kind of classed
It does not modify an NP.
It has no antecedent.
Typically headed by a subordinator (that, whether, if) or is bare.
Examples¶
> She believes that he is honest
→ that he is honest = content clause, complement of believes
> That she resigned surprised everyone
→ content clause functioning as subject
Key properties:¶
Replaces an NP (She believes this).
No gap linked to an antecedent.
Not paraphrasable as an NP modifier.
Typically a complement (object)
Can be nested, recursively (subpart of…, which is subpart of… etc)
Jerry says
[that Susan thinks]
[the committe is going to decide]
Common functionality¶
Content clause is NP-like
Function |
Example |
Analysis |
|---|---|---|
Complement of verb |
I think that she is right. |
Content clause functioning as complement of think |
Subject |
That he lied surprised everyone. |
Content clause functioning as subject |
Extraposed subject |
It surprised everyone that he lied. |
Content clause functioning as extraposed subject |
Complement of adjective |
I am glad that you came. |
Content clause functioning as complement of adjective |
Complement of noun |
The fact that he lied shocked us. |
Content clause functioning as complement of noun (fact) |
As subject¶
Can be subject, if the predicate VP has the right sort of meaning
[Whether he will come] is uncertain.
“Whether he will come”: content clause, subject of is uncertain
“is”: copular verb
“uncertain”: predicative complement
[That our neighbors would go to all that trouble] makes me feel glad that I live here
In subject function, content clauses can be optionally extra-posed
It surprised everyone that she resigned (extra-posed subject)
The complementizer (that, whether) remains the head of the clause.
Declarative¶
Using that subordinate, Can be complement of:
Verb (believe, think)
Adjective (happy, glad)
Noun (like fact or idea)
Preposition (since, because)
The subordinate is sometimes optional, forbidden after preposition
We think that they were careful*
We think they were careful
We had no idea that they were so careful
We had no idea they were so careful
We trusted them because that they were so careful
We trusted them because they were so careful
Mandative is a type of declarative clause that cannot be a main clause.
Interrogative¶
Like main interrogative, can be closed or open
Closed begins with whether or if
Open with interrogative word like who or what
Various kinds of main clause world
I wonder whether they …
I wonder who they …
It’s unclear whether/who …
I asked him about whether/who …
Don’t have the auxiliary that main interrogatives have before the subject
Don’t actually ask, though close meaning to asking
Main clause closed interrogatives are marked by subject–auxiliary inversion, but their subordinate counterparts generally have the usual subject–predicate order and are normally introduced by either one of the interrogative subordinators, whether and if (remember, the interrogative subordinator if is a different item from the conditional preposition if
Did he accept the offer? (main)
I’m unsure whether he accepted the offer.
Will you chair the meeting? (main)
She asked me if I’d chair the meeting.
Like declaratives, interrogative content clauses– both open and closed– usually function as complements
Exclamatives¶
It’s amazing how strong this stuff is
It’s not an answer to “how strong”, but a comment.