Stance options

Grammatical rhetorical options

If you want to…

Preferred resource

Example

Rhetorical effect

Express possibility or uncertainty

Modal auxiliary

The policy may reduce inequality.

Makes the claim appropriately tentative while keeping the focus on the proposition.

Express obligation, necessity, or prediction

Modal auxiliary

Governments must address housing shortages.

Presents the claim as a recommendation, necessity, or prediction.

Express your personal judgement

Stance verb

I believe this policy is misguided.

Makes the author’s viewpoint explicit; common in opinion writing, less common in formal academic prose.

Present an inference or appearance

Stance verb

The results suggest that… / It seems that…

Emphasises the reasoning or evidence behind the claim.

Qualify the proposition directly

Stance adverb

The policy will probably fail.

Keeps the focus on the claim while calibrating certainty.

Signal evaluation or correction

Stance adverb

The proposal is actually more expensive. / The argument is clearly flawed.

Guides the reader’s interpretation without making the writer the topic.

Present an evaluation impersonally

Stance adjective

It is unlikely that the reforms will succeed.

Sounds objective and analytical by foregrounding the evaluation rather than the evaluator.

Ground the claim in evidence or concepts

Stance noun

The evidence suggests that… / There is a strong possibility that…

Depersonalises the argument and gives it an academic tone.

Stance adverbs

Stance adverb

Example

Modal adjunct?

Rhetorical effect / Typical use

actually

The policy is actually more expensive than expected.

No

Signals correction or contrast with a previous assumption.

allegedly

The funds were allegedly misused.

Yes

Attributes a claim to reports while avoiding commitment to its truth.

apparently

The reform has apparently failed to achieve its goals.

Yes

Indicates information based on indirect evidence or reports.

arguably

The decision was arguably the most important reform of the decade.

Yes

Presents a claim as debatable but well supported.

certainly

The policy will certainly affect future generations.

Yes

Expresses strong confidence in a claim.

clearly

The results clearly demonstrate the need for change.

Yes

Presents a conclusion as strongly supported or evident.

conceivably

The proposal could conceivably create new opportunities.

Yes

Marks a realistic but relatively remote possibility.

definitely

The government has definitely changed its approach.

Yes

Expresses strong certainty; more common in speech and informal writing.

essentially

The debate is essentially about how resources are distributed.

No

Reduces complexity to the central point.

evidently

The policy has evidently produced unintended consequences.

Yes

Shows that the conclusion follows from available evidence.

fortunately

The economy has fortunately recovered faster than expected.

No

Adds the writer’s positive evaluation of the outcome.

frankly

The proposal is frankly unrealistic.

No

Signals directness or personal candour.

generally

The reforms have generally improved public services.

No

Makes a broad claim while allowing exceptions.

hopefully

The changes will hopefully lead to greater transparency.

No

Expresses a desired outcome rather than a prediction.

indeed

The problem is indeed more complex than it first appeared.

No

Reinforces or confirms a previous statement.

inevitably

The transition will inevitably create challenges.

Yes

Presents an outcome as unavoidable.

likely

The policy is likely to increase costs.

Yes

Expresses probability based on evidence or reasoning.

mainly

The problem is mainly caused by economic factors.

No

Identifies the primary factor while limiting the claim.

naturally

The public naturally expects accountability.

No

Presents a reaction as expected or reasonable.

necessarily

Economic growth does not necessarily reduce inequality.

Yes

Qualifies a claim about logical necessity.

obviously

The proposal is obviously flawed.

Yes

Presents a conclusion as self-evident; use cautiously, as it can sound dismissive.

patently

The claim is patently false.

Yes

Presents a conclusion as unmistakably evident; common in formal criticism.

perhaps

The policy is perhaps the most significant change in recent years.

Yes

Softens a claim and leaves room for alternative interpretations.

possibly

The reform could possibly reduce costs.

Yes

Expresses a weak possibility.

presumably

The committee will presumably publish its findings next month.

Yes

Signals a reasonable inference based on known facts.

probably

The policy will probably fail without further changes.

Yes

Expresses a likely but not certain outcome.

regrettably

The programme was regrettably discontinued.

No

Adds the writer’s negative evaluation of the outcome.

reportedly

The minister has reportedly resigned.

Yes

Attributes information to reports without confirming its truth.

remarkably

The economy has remarkably recovered despite the crisis.

No

Highlights an unexpected or notable feature.

significantly

The policy has significantly improved access to education.

No

Emphasises importance or magnitude.

simply

The issue is simply a matter of implementation.

No

Presents an explanation as straightforward; may minimise complexity.

surprisingly

The results were surprisingly consistent across groups.

No

Signals that the finding differs from expectations.

undoubtedly

Climate change is undoubtedly a major challenge.

Yes

Expresses very high certainty.

unfortunately

The reforms have unfortunately widened inequality.

No

Adds the writer’s negative evaluation of the outcome.

usually

Such policies usually produce mixed results.

No

Makes a generalisation while allowing exceptions.

virtually

The proposal is virtually impossible to implement.

No

Means “almost completely”; strengthens a claim without making it absolute.

widely

The approach is widely regarded as effective.

No

Signals broad acceptance or consensus.

This is a reference for advanced writing. It combines:

  • Epistemic/modal resources (probability, certainty, inference, necessity),

  • Evaluative stance (fortunately, regrettably, surprisingly),

  • Discourse/framing (actually, indeed, essentially),

  • Generalisation and focus (generally, mainly, usually),

  • Degree and consensus (significantly, virtually, widely).